AIFear Report
LiveUpdated recently2026-11-04 16:31Z
The Fear Index

Rank 9 of 17

Algorithmic pricing

Algorithms or AI setting what people pay: landlords' rent-setting software, prices tailored to a person's data, or competitors coordinating prices through a shared algorithm.

64

on the Fear Index

Bills80
Lobbying filings6
News154
Wikipedia4.5K

The receipts

4,494Wikipedia views on this fear in the last 30 days
154news articles about it in the last 30 days
80bills, resolutions, rules and orders cite it since January 2025, in 29 states and Congress
64new government controls written into those bills
6federal lobbying filings name it, past year

In their own words

The fear as each bill's official summary or text states it, and the controls the same bill would create.

  • “operating or licensing a software, data analytics service, or algorithmic device that performs a coordinating function on behalf of or between and among such residential rental property owners or managers”
    S 7882, New YorkPassedUse limits
  • “requires disclosure of algorithmically set prices for goods and services”
    S 3008, New YorkPassedLabel or AI notice
  • “algorithmic pricing of essential consumer goods”
    SB 1140, WisconsinNot passedNew agency powersUse limits
  • “prohibiting personalized algorithmic pricing and surveillance pricing at certain food retail establishments”
    SF 2278, IowaNot passedUse limits
  • “prohibits a food retail establishment from using personalized algorithmic pricing”
    HB 2052, TennesseeNot passedUse limits

Who benefits

Agencies and officials these bills would hand new power, by number of bills.

  1. 1Pennsylvania Attorney GeneralAttorney generalmost common control: New agency powers1bill
  2. 2Pennsylvania Bureau of Consumer ProtectionAgencymost common control: New agency powers1bill
  3. 3Colorado Attorney GeneralAttorney generalmost common control: Use limits1bill

Everyone else lobbying

Companies, trade groups, think tanks, unions and other groups whose lobbying filings name this fear, past year.

  1. 1KrogerLobbying client1 filing
  2. 2Center for Responsible Lending a Supporting Corp of CTR for Community Self-HelpLobbying client1 filing
  3. 3Grubhub HoldingsLobbying client1 filing
  4. 4Internet WorksLobbying client1 filing
  5. 5Small Business & Entrepreneurship Council (Sbe Council)Lobbying client1 filing
  6. 6Association of National AdvertisersLobbying client1 filing

Money, bills and attention

Money on filings naming it
Bills citing it
Wikipedia views
Money on filings naming itBills citing itWikipedia views202420252026Q2 2024: $73.3K on lobbying filings naming this fearQ1 2025: $1.8M on lobbying filings naming this fearQ1 2026: $400K on lobbying filings naming this fearQ3 2026: $233.4K on lobbying filings naming this fearQ4 2024: 1 billQ1 2025: 42 billsQ1 2025: 42 billsQ1 2025: 42 billsQ1 2025: 42 billsQ1 2025: 42 billsQ2 2025: 3 billsQ3 2025: 2 billsQ4 2025: 1 billQ1 2026: 26 billsQ1 2026: 26 billsQ1 2026: 26 billsQ2 2026: 5 billsQ1 2024: 7,870 Wikipedia viewsQ2 2024: 17,922 Wikipedia viewsQ3 2024: 19,301 Wikipedia viewsQ4 2024: 10,630 Wikipedia viewsQ1 2025: 10,961 Wikipedia viewsQ2 2025: 8,830 Wikipedia viewsQ3 2025: 9,648 Wikipedia viewsQ4 2025: 11,711 Wikipedia viewsQ1 2026: 10,051 Wikipedia viewsQ2 2026: 16,908 Wikipedia viewsQ3 2026: 16,912 Wikipedia viewsQ4 2026: 6,027 Wikipedia views7.9K6K

Each dot is 9 bills. Sources: lobbying filings on LDA.gov that name this fear, the bills that cite it, and Wikipedia readership of its articles.

Latest on this fear

The bills

The ones carrying the most controls, first.

  • SB 1140, WisconsinNot passedRelating to: algorithmic pricing of essential consumer goods, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty.New agency powersUse limitsRead it on docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
  • AB 1190, WisconsinNot passedRelating to: algorithmic pricing of essential consumer goods, granting rule-making authority, and providing a penalty.New agency powersUse limitsRead it on docs.legis.wisconsin.gov
  • A 11599, New YorkNot passedProhibits anticompetitive and deceptive algorithmic pricing practicesUse limitsRead it on nyassembly.gov
  • A 11490, New YorkNot passedProhibits dynamic pricing, algorithm or automated pricing tools in the sale or rental of any residential dwelling unitUse limitsRead it on nyassembly.gov
  • S 4314, New JerseyNot passedProhibits personalized algorithmic pricing and surveillance-based pricing by certain retailers in online commerce.Use limitsRead it on njleg.state.nj.us
  • S 9700, New YorkNot passedProhibits the use of an algorithmic device by a landlord for the purpose of determining the amount of rent to charge a residential tenantUse limitsRead it on nyassembly.gov
  • A 4685, New JerseyNot passedProhibits use and sale of algorithmic devices that set sale price of goods or services.Use limitsRead it on njleg.state.nj.us
  • S 2983, MassachusettsNot passedAn Act prohibiting algorithmic rent settingUse limitsRead it on malegislature.gov
  • S 3732, New JerseyNot passedProhibits certain businesses from using dynamic, surveillance, or personalized algorithmic pricing when selling groceries to consumers.Use limitsRead it on njleg.state.nj.us
  • SB 559, GeorgiaNot passed"Fair Business Practices Act of 1975"; any person from facilitating noncompete agreements between residential rental property owners or managers, including by…Use limitsRead it on legis.ga.gov
All 80 bills citing it, with filters

Keep the report running

Card

Through Square. Opens its own checkout.

Pitch in
Bitcoin